|
Harrelson
Trial Highlights Benefits of Industrial Hemp
THE
NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER
September 8, 2000
By Father John S. Rausch
BEREA,
KY - Louie Nunn, Kentucky's former Republican governor, grabbed
a candy bar made of hemp seed. Now a venerable statesman in the
commonwealth, Nunn gave the closing argument in defense of actor
Woody Harrelson, accused of planting hemp seeds in Lee County.
"By holding this candy bar in my hand I am in possession of marijuana
according to the [Kentucky] statute, Nunn told the jury. Tearing
off the wrapper, he munched a corner of the bar and continued,
"Now I got it on me, and I got it in me."
Great
theater for a misdemeanor trial that attracted adoring fans, the
national press and advocates of industrial hemp. Most state laws,
including Kentucky's make no distinction between marijuana and
industrial hemp. Yet, while one gets users high, the other promises
to strengthen the economic base for many rural families and help
the environment for all.
Hemp,
a crop of myriad uses, represents a viable alternative to tobacco
for family farms. Hemp paper will preserve forests from vast clear-cut
logging. Hemp clothing will spare soil the petrochemical supplements
demanded by other fiber crops. For Appalachia, hemp offers a sustainable
direction that promises a variety of light manufacturing for small
communities.
Unfortunately,
industrial hemp is illegal.
The
Harrelson trial on Aug. 24 in the heart of Appalachia in Beattyville,
Ky., (population 1,131) highlighted the confusions between marijuana
and industrial hemp. Both are part of the genus cannabis. Legally,
to possess industrial hemp is to possess marijuana. On June 1,
1996, Harrelson was arrested during a test of the law's ambiguity.
He planted four certified industrial hemp seeds in view of the
Lee County sheriff and a video camera crew.
Advocates
of hemp say the difference between marijuana and industrial hemp
- although they are essentially the same plant - lies in the psychoactive
ingredient, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which produces a drug
high. Whereas street marijuana contains 3 to 15 percent tetrahydrocannabinol
industrial hemp, which is bred differently, has only 0.3 percent.
The scare of a marijuana epidemic pushed legislators beginning
in the 1930s to gradually prohibit all forms of cannabis.
Curiously,
several local folks attending the trial remembered their grandparents
growing hemp with government-issued seeds in the "Hemp for Victory"
campaign during World War II. Counselor Nunn even reminded the
jury that the Declaration of Independence was written on paper
made from hemp.
Harrelson
recalled that in the early 1990s, as an avowed environmentalist,
he was searching for alternatives to National Forestry Service
plans to lease 6 million acres of forests for mining and clear
cut logging. Old-growth forests would be cut down to make paper.
Hemp offered an alternative. The same paper products currently
made from 100-year-old forests could be made from hemp grown in
120 days.
In
Appalachia vast stands of forests keep chip mills and paper plants
humming. Hemp could limit the bite of the chainsaw. Further, industrial
hemp grows without the need of fungicides, herbicides or insecticides.
Although it needs some nitrogen fertilizer, its deep roots can
improve the soil's structure.
Hemp
paper is acid-free and takes less energy and fewer toxic chemicals
to produce than wood fiber paper. For Appalachia, growing and
processing industrial hemp would mean less pollution. Though still
one of the states with the most farms, Kentucky has seen its farms
dwindle from 267,000 in 1940 to 88,000 in 1997. Most small Kentucky
farms, especially those in Appalachia, survive with some tobacco
base. Family farms hold out intangible values such as a sense
of place, opportunity for physical labor, and connection to the
land. Neighbor helps neighbor; communities look out for their
own. To lose family farms is to forfeit a basic source of spirituality
in the region. But amid concern for public health and a diminishing
domestic market for tobacco, the keystone of the Appalachia's
small-farm economy bets for an alternative.
Tobacco
gives the farmer toughly $2,000 net per acre. While field crops
like corn or soybeans yield around $70 net an acre, raw hemp returns
about $400 net an acre. Replacing tobacco with industrial hemp
means utilizing five times more land to maintain the income equivalent
of tobacco, a difficult challenge in mountainous Appalachia. Still
hemp represents numerous possibilities for economic development
beyond the crop itself. With industrial hemp grown in and around
Appalachia, mountain communities could spawn small companies for
manufacturing.
Hemp
products can include baseball, lingerie, jeans, lip balm, veggie
burgers, paper, shoes and building supplies. It can be used in
plastics, as a non-toxic alternative to fiberglass and blended
with other textile fibers. Industrial hemp could comprise part
of a potential alternative to the world's dependence on petroleum,
forest products and toxic chemicals.
In
Kentucky, though, where illegal marijuana is arguably the largest
cash crop, it is illegal to wear clothing made from hemp. State
law bars the University of Kentucky from research on uses of hemp.
At the Harrelson trial the prosecution had to prove beyond reasonable
doubt that the defendant had hemp-marijuana in this possession
and that he intended to break the law. Although the prosecution
played a 10 second showing Harrelson hoeing the seed bed, displaying
the seeds and patting the ground after planting, it neglected
one convincing step: it never retrieved the seed or tested the
plant.
"How
do you know they weren't pumpkin seeds?" asked Nunn. The
failure to test and retrieve physical evidence, plus the commonsense
reasoning of the jurors (I couldn't send someone to jail for planting
four seeds," one juror is reported to have said), kept this
case from becoming a media circus akin to the 1925 "Scopes
Monkey Trial," in which schoolteacher John T. Scopes was
found guilty of teaching evolution.
The
verdict in the Harrison trial: not guilty. The Harrison case did
not change the law. Two years ago the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled
the law constitutional with its definition of marijuana. To change
the laws, both sates and federal, means educating the public about
how 32 countries throughout the world, including Canada, England
and Germany produce industrial hemp with licenses and safeguards.
It
means challenging the official policy of the US Drug Enforcement
Administration: zero tolerance for THC. And, it probably means
fighting the wealth and powers of the petrochemical, timber and
fiber lobbies. Only a David with a slingshot could do that. Still,
smiling Woody Harrelson with hoe in hand might have prepared a
seedbed for new thinking, leading to sprouts of hope in Appalachia.
<<
Back to menu
|